The Taos Hum Mysterious low frequency hum

Pets

Residents in Great Britain and parts of the southwestern United States have subsisted by complaining of an infuriating buzz that continues to persist at this time. Furthermore, researchers have been powerless to determine its origin. Not everyone can hear the low-pitched hum, apart from those who say it seems simulated in nature.

In 1977, a UK newspaper received almost 800 correspondences from people complaining of loss of sleep, dizziness, shortness of breath, headache, restlessness, bad mood, worsening health, inability to read or study due to hum continuous. The best known in the United States is the “Taos Hum”. There the annoyance was so serious for the “listeners” in Taos, United States, that they coordinated and called Congress to investigate the issue and help them determine the origins of the sound. No definitive sources were discovered, however, a widespread assumption contains that the hum is produced by a military communications device used to communicate with submarines.

Most listeners talk about sound that starts quickly, never subsides, makes sleep difficult, and is more evident inside a home or motor vehicle than outside. Some characterize it as a sound similar to a diesel engine idling, in the distance. Since it has not been corroborated by microphones or very low frequency antennas, its origin and nature are nevertheless an enigma.

In 1997, Congress led researchers and commentators from some of the nation’s most esteemed research institutions to investigate a curious low-frequency “Taos Hum” heard by residents in and around the small town of Taos, New Mexico. . For years, those who had heard the sound, often characterized by them as a “hum,” had been searching for solutions. No one was sure when it began, but its sequel initially led a handful of participants and then many who heard it (‘listeners’) to come together.

The convened Research Congress included a lineup of about 12 researchers from various scientific organizations. Joe Mullins of the New Mexico Academy and Horace Poteet of Sandia National Labs wrote the team’s final account. Other participating New Mexico research associations included the Phillips Air Force Research Laboratory and the Los Alamos National Research Laboratory. Listeners’ fears that the buzz might have been produced by the Department of Defense ensured that the investigation was carried out openly and that a considerable number of people were contacted.

The initial objective of the research team was to open a dialogue with the listeners to try to decide the disposition of the hum, the noise it caused, its frequency, the programming and the effects on those who perceived it. Following this, the team intended to survey residents of Taos and neighboring districts to decide to what extent the hum was present. Eventually, the team would try to isolate and decide the source of the noise. Important to their attempt was the obvious benefit to the group in deciding the source of the occurrence, rather than examining the existence of the noise. There was a widely apparent understanding on the part of the researchers that something was going on, but precisely what appeared to be an interpretation was disputed.

The main investigation concentrated on 10 listeners and decided crucial definite details surrounding the noise. It was continuous, heard by a small number of people, and the noise was very low in the frequency range between 30 and 80 Hz. There was variety in how various listeners detected the noise, and some heard a noise similar to that of the engine of the a truck with a low reverberation, while other people perceived a more constant noise, pulsing, although still low. Interestingly, the researchers found that the noise was not limited to the region around Taos, but was actually heard in various places in the state as well as around the world.

Listeners characterized the increasing difficulties they were having with noise. Consistent with the stories and complaints that had brought the issue to Congress in the first place, listeners specified noise as a source of not only aggravation, but also mild dizziness, insomnia or sleep interference, ear constriction, ear aches, in the head. and nosebleeds. The listeners were more disturbed by the worrying nature of their livelihood, it did not seem like a normal occurrence.

According to the informal report of the Taos Hum investigation released on August 23, 1993, most listeners initially experienced the noise with a sudden onset, as if an appliance had simply turned on. Several of the listeners inferred that there was an association between the noise, military units in and around New Mexico, and that the hum was somehow produced by the US Army’s extremely low-frequency locations in the region. northern Michigan. These suggestions prompted a non-military presence on the investigative team.

After studying 10 listeners, the group that now included James Kelly, a hearing exam scientist at the New Mexico Institute Health Sciences Center, began a comprehensive survey of the Taos locals. Their examination of 1,440 residents led the team to surmise that approximately 2% of Taos residents were hearing. In view of this large number of listeners, the initial examination of noise sources focused on the unusual opportunities for low-frequency noise generation. Although there were isolated cases of hearing within the low-frequency range recognized by listeners, these evaluations did not show coherent background noise that could have explained the noise. As Mullins and Kelly deduced, there were “no known acoustic signals that could explain the noise, nor any seismic events that could describe it.”

Having ruled out extraneous origins, the team turned to examining the listeners’ inner ears and analyzing the frequency response. While these studies are not complete, it seems highly unlikely that the noise is generated by low-frequency tinnitus as some have contemplated. Mullins and Kelly are more likely to support that listeners have developed a particular sensitivity to noise in the 20 to 100 Hz range and are therefore directing their research toward gathering information about how the ear detects noise activity. Low frequency.

While this work may improve the response to the persistent noise source problem, Dr. Nick Begich and Patrick Flanagan have investigated another possibility. Dr. Nick Begich has some compelling insights in Mullins’ own comments that might infer another origin for listeners’ unmatched sensibility and, possibly in the long run, the result of his nearly exhausting misfortune. To encourage research prospects from him, Mullins has indicated that, as a society, “we are constantly building the foundation of electronic noise and progressively moving towards wireless or wireless devices, all electromagnetic transmitters. If that’s the cause of the noise, we don’t understand it, but we can’t rule it out.’

Begich speculates that the source of the noise may be discovered within this buildup of electromagnetic background.

He maintains that there is an apparatus for pitch transduction that could explain the noise. Crucial information may be hidden in a technology discovered by Dr. Patrick Flanagan. Neurophonic sound technologies advanced and established themselves on the realization of noise transmission using distinctive ‘hearing’ pathways to the mind. Average noise assessment and symptomatic devices would be unproductive in detecting the origins of ‘sounds’.

Patrick Flanagan’s neurophone, designed when Flanagan was fourteen, is a high-frequency, low-voltage, amplitude-modulated radio oscillator. In clearer terms, the neurophone acts on the listener’s skin transforming modified radio waves into a modulated neural signal that bypasses the eighth cranial auditory neuron and immediately communicates information to the investigative nuclei of the mind. ‘In other words, the neurophone allows the listener to ‘hear’ without having to exercise the ear canal or the bones and nerves that we normally see with hearing.

Flanagan’s license was certified after a 6-year battle with the patent office that concluded with an evaluation of the device on a hearing-impaired patent office worker. The display convinced the patent tester that the Neurophone worked, even though it seemed to go against conventional concepts of how we perceive noise. The novel idea with the neurophone is that we use the skin as a neural transmitter.

This idea is actually quite easy. When in a woman’s womb, the fetus’s skin functions as the primary sensory receptor. From this evolve the eyes, nose and ears. While the ears specialize in hearing, Flanagan identified that the skin is also an organ. As a result, if a path could be established to transfer data through the skin to the mind, then the data could be instantly transmitted to the mind, bypassing the ears.

The Neurophone inserted radio waves between two small electrodes placed on the skin and used primarily the existing neural tracts to instantly access the mind. Flanagan and Begich theorize that the neurophone could be pulsed at frequencies recognized by listeners questioned by Mullins and the research group. If the noise was caused by ambient electromagnetic areas, Neurophone technology may be used to quieten the noise. While Mullins is examining the ear canal and our human hearing devices, Flanagan and Begich conceive that the solution is more likely to lie through the pathways demonstrated by the Neurophone, which bypass the ear entirely.

Evidence of whether or not your hypothesis is accurate is binding upon examination of listeners. If Begich and Flanagan are right, Neurophonic technology and what has been widely read about hearing can be used successfully to lessen listeners’ distress as the search for the source of the noise continues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *